The 'Open Door' policy and immigration, to 1928
The ‘Open Door’ policy and immigration, to 1928
‘Open Door’ Policy and Immigration to 1928
Overview
- The ‘Open Door’ policy was a fundamental part of US immigration policy until the 1920s.
- This policy allowed virtually unrestricted immigration into the United States.
- It was based on the belief that immigrants were crucial for the country’s economic growth and for maintaining a diverse population.
Impact of World War I
- Post-World War I, sentiment began to shift against the ‘Open Door’ policy.
- A rising tide of nativism and xenophobia, in part due to worries about competition for jobs and cultural changes, fuelled this shift.
- Large numbers of European immigrants coming to the US in the wake of World War I were sometimes viewed as a potential security threat.
Legislation Changes
- The Emergency Quota Act of 1921 marked the end of the ‘Open Door’ policy, implementing quotas on immigration for the first time.
- Each nationality received a quota based on its representation in the US population in the 1910 census.
- This was followed by the Immigration Act of 1924 (Johnson-Reed Act), further restricting immigration and changing the basis of the quotas to the 1890 census.
- These laws significantly favoured Western and Northern European immigrants, leading to a drastic decrease in immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe, Asia and Africa.
Rise of the Klu Klux Klan
- The 1920s also saw a significant rise in the influence of the Klu Klux Klan, a white supremacist group.
- The Klan was widely supported by those who felt threatened by the cultural changes stemming from immigration.
- Their influence further contributed to the restrictive changes in immigration policy during this period.
Impact on Civil Rights
- These restrictive changes in immigration policy sowed the seeds for civil rights issues that would come to the forefront in later decades.
- They maintained and exacerbated racial and ethnic inequalities within the US.
- Many of the immigrants affected by these policies would, in due course, become active in the struggle for civil rights.