The Working Memory Model

The Basics of the Working Memory Model

  • Working Memory Model is a cognitive model that describes short term memory.
  • The model was proposed by Alan Baddeley and Graham Hitch in 1974.

Core Components of the Model

  • The model consists of three main components: the Central Executive, the Phonological Loop, and the Visuospatial Sketchpad.
  • Central Executive: This works as a control centre and directs attention to particular tasks. It does not store information and has a limited capacity.
  • Phonological Loop: This is involved with the temporary storage of auditory information. It has two parts - The phonological store, which holds words we hear, and the articulatory control process, which holds words we are about to say.
  • Visuospatial Sketchpad: This temporarily stores and manipulates visual and spatial information. It helps in tasks like remembering shapes and colours or the location of objects.

Additional Components Added Later

  • Episodic Buffer: Baddeley added this in 2000. It acts as a ‘backup’ store which communicates with both long term memory and the components of working memory.

Key Concepts and Processes

  • Dual-task performance: The model can explain how we can do two tasks at once, as long as they use different processing systems.
  • Maintenance rehearsal: The process of repeating information to hold it in short term memory for longer.

Critiques of the Working Memory Model

  • Some researchers suggest the model oversimplifies memory processes, as it doesn’t consider the influence of strategies or goals.
  • It also does not clearly explain how the different components of the model interact with each other.
  • The central executive is a vague concept and difficult to test experimentally.

Supporting Evidence for the Working Memory Model

  • Research, such as brain-scanning studies, support the existence of the phonological loop and visuospatial sketchpad.
  • Clinical evidence includes studies of patients with brain damage, which show differential impairments which can be explained by damage to different parts of the model.
  • Studies of word length effect support the phonological loop.