Individual Differences in Obedience and Prejudice
Individual Differences in Obedience and Prejudice
Personality Factors
- Authoritarian personality theorists such as Adorno et al. argue that those with authoritarian characteristics are more likely to obey and show prejudice.
- The F-scale (Fascism scale) was developed by Adorno et al. to measure this authoritarianism.
- According to Milgram, people who score high on measures of obedience and low on the F-scale are more likely to obey authority.
- Sitkin and Pablo suggest that obedience may be influenced by one’s level of responsibility-orientation.
Situational Factors
- Milgram found that obedience rates varied depending on factors like proximity and location, suggesting the situation also influences obedience.
- Similarly, prejudice may be affected by situational factors, such as intergroup competition or threats to social identity.
Role of Education and Experience
- The level of education and personal experience someone has can impact their levels of obedience and prejudice. Well-educated individuals or those with diverse experiences are typically less prejudiced.
Cognition and Social Learning
- Cognitive processes, including categorisation, stereotyping and schema processing, play vital roles in prejudice.
- Likewise, social learning theory proposes that behaviours, including obedience and prejudiced views, can be learned through observing and imitating others.
Biological Factors
- Some theorists argue that obedience and prejudice could be biologically determined, though this perspective is highly debated. Examples of possible biological factors include genetics and brain structure.
Role of Culture
- Some cultures may reinforce obedient behaviours and prejudiced attitudes. Industrialized cultures tend to exhibit higher obedience and prejudice, according to Berry.