Evaluation

Analyzing Augustine’s Theories

Augustine’s view of Original Sin: While his concept is supported by some Christian groups, others find it inconsistent with a loving and forgiving God. His harsh interpretation of the fall has faced criticism for reinforcing ideas of inborn sinfulness.
Problem of Evil: Some argue that Augustine’s explanation of evil as a privation doesn’t fully address the problem. It still raises questions about why a good God would allow evil to exist.
Predestination: Augustine’s views on predestination make it harder to justify human moral responsibility and free will. It has been argued that these concepts are intrinsically contradictory.

Influence on Western Thought: Augustine’s views, particularly about innate sin and divine grace, have heavily influenced Western Christian theology, contributing to doctrines around guilt and redemption.
Modern Relevance: While some people argue that Augustine’s teachings feel outdated in the progressive modern world, others highlight their relevance in discussions about human motivation, morals and the nature of evil.

Pelagius’ Opposition: Pelagius rejected Augustine’s notion of Original Sin, believing that humans are capable of choosing good without divine intervention. This directly contradicts Augustine’s conviction that humanity is wholly dependent on God’s grace for salvation.
Humanists’ assessment: Humanistic thinkers often critique Augustine’s negative view of human nature. They propose that his teachings create a self-depreciating cycle, underestimating human potential for growth and goodness.