Theoretical perspectives Families/Households: Marxist
Theoretical perspectives Families/Households: Marxist
Marxist Perspective on Families and Households
General Overview: The Marxists’ View
- Marxists see the family as part of the superstructure, which is influenced by the economic base of society and helps to maintain and justify the capitalist system.
- The family, in this perspective, is seen as a tool of capitalist societies, serving its needs and contributing to the persistence of social inequalities.
Functions of the Family for Capitalism
- Marxists argue that families raise the future labour force cheaply by socialising children into societal norms and values. This helps reproduce necessary human resources for capitalism.
- Families are consumers of goods and services, thus fuelling capitalist consumer culture and contributing to the profits of businessmen.
- According to Friedrich Engels, marriage and the family are rooted in private property relations. They play a key role in the transfer of property between generations, thereby preserving wealth and social inequalities.
Criticisms of the Traditional Nuclear Family
- The traditional nuclear family is seen as a hindrance to social equality. It’s a social construct that reinforces capitalist values, including patriarchy and class exploitation.
- Marxists argue that the family serves to brainwash individuals into conforming to capitalist ideology, a concept known as ideological control.
Gender Inequalities: The Marxist Feminist View
- Marxist feminists view the family as a means of exploiting women, both in their roles as unpaid homemakers and as consumers of household goods.
- They argue that the domestic work provided by women within their families serves to subsidise the capitalist economy, as it is unpaid labour that benefits the bourgeoisie.
Changes Over Time: The Modern Family
- Not all Marxist sociologists agree that the traditional family structure is the only one that supports capitalism. Some suggest that variations in family forms – such as single-parent families and cohabitation – might also uphold the capitalist system by adapting to its needs and constraints.
- The plurality of families in modern societies could be seen as a reflection of the capitalist drive for profit, as diverse family forms create new markets for goods and services.
Critique of the Marxist Perspective
- Critics argue that the Marxist perspective overemphasizes economic factors and neglects other influences on families, such as cultural or emotional aspects.
- Some argue that the Marxist perspective can be too deterministic, suggesting that individuals have no agency in shaping their family lives.
- Others point out that evidence of familial diversity and fluidity contradicts the Marxist idea of a single, dominant family type serving capitalism. This raises the question of how accurately the Marxist perspective represents the complexity and diversity of contemporary families and households.