Theoretical perspectives Families/Households: Marxist

Theoretical perspectives Families/Households: Marxist

Marxist Perspective on Families and Households

General Overview: The Marxists’ View

  • Marxists see the family as part of the superstructure, which is influenced by the economic base of society and helps to maintain and justify the capitalist system.
  • The family, in this perspective, is seen as a tool of capitalist societies, serving its needs and contributing to the persistence of social inequalities.

Functions of the Family for Capitalism

  • Marxists argue that families raise the future labour force cheaply by socialising children into societal norms and values. This helps reproduce necessary human resources for capitalism.
  • Families are consumers of goods and services, thus fuelling capitalist consumer culture and contributing to the profits of businessmen.
  • According to Friedrich Engels, marriage and the family are rooted in private property relations. They play a key role in the transfer of property between generations, thereby preserving wealth and social inequalities.

Criticisms of the Traditional Nuclear Family

  • The traditional nuclear family is seen as a hindrance to social equality. It’s a social construct that reinforces capitalist values, including patriarchy and class exploitation.
  • Marxists argue that the family serves to brainwash individuals into conforming to capitalist ideology, a concept known as ideological control.

Gender Inequalities: The Marxist Feminist View

  • Marxist feminists view the family as a means of exploiting women, both in their roles as unpaid homemakers and as consumers of household goods.
  • They argue that the domestic work provided by women within their families serves to subsidise the capitalist economy, as it is unpaid labour that benefits the bourgeoisie.

Changes Over Time: The Modern Family

  • Not all Marxist sociologists agree that the traditional family structure is the only one that supports capitalism. Some suggest that variations in family forms – such as single-parent families and cohabitation – might also uphold the capitalist system by adapting to its needs and constraints.
  • The plurality of families in modern societies could be seen as a reflection of the capitalist drive for profit, as diverse family forms create new markets for goods and services.

Critique of the Marxist Perspective

  • Critics argue that the Marxist perspective overemphasizes economic factors and neglects other influences on families, such as cultural or emotional aspects.
  • Some argue that the Marxist perspective can be too deterministic, suggesting that individuals have no agency in shaping their family lives.
  • Others point out that evidence of familial diversity and fluidity contradicts the Marxist idea of a single, dominant family type serving capitalism. This raises the question of how accurately the Marxist perspective represents the complexity and diversity of contemporary families and households.