Theoretical perspectives of Youth Cultures: Interactionalist

Theoretical perspectives of Youth Cultures: Interactionalist

Interactionist Views on Youth Cultures

  • Interactionists focus on individual action and interaction within society, rather than viewing society as a system with predefined rules and functions.
  • They believe that youth subcultures are generated from the actions and interactions of individuals, not determined by societal pressures or structural elements.
  • Interactionist perspective views youth cultures as an arena where individuals experiment with their identities, discovering and defining who they are through their interactions.
  • This perspective suggests that youth subcultures evolve dynamically in response to the changing needs and experiences of young people.

Role of Youth Cultures in Society: An Interactionist Perspective

  • Youth subcultures are seen as influential in shaping an individual’s values, behaviour, and self-perception. They provide a space where identity can be negotiated and constructed.
  • From an interactionist viewpoint, youth cultures provide opportunities for individuals to resist mainstream societal norms, therefore offering the possibility of social change.
  • Interactionists suggest that mature societies are adaptable and can tolerate a certain level of subcultural divergence as it is a necessary ingredient for societal evolution.

Critiques of the Interactionist Views on Youth Cultures

  • Critics argue that the interactionist perspective puts too much emphasis on individual agency and does not adequately account for structural constraints, such as socio-economic conditions.
  • The interactionist view is said to romanticise subcultures, depicting them as conscious, coherent responses to societal pressures, ignoring the element of power dynamics within and between these groups.
  • Critics also argue that interactionists often disregard the wider societal context and the influence of societal structures on youth cultures. They believe that the interactionist view is overly micro-focused, losing the broader picture of youth cultures in society.
  • Some critics argue that interactionism lacks a clear, testable hypothesis and that its theories are often vague and ambiguous, making them difficult to assess or challenge.