Theoretical perspectives of education: Postmodernist
Theoretical perspectives of education: Postmodernist
Postmodernist Perspective on Education
- Postmodernists propose a paradigm shift from the traditional, macro theories like functionalism and Marxism. They believe these theories to be redundant in a society that is now characterised by diversity and fragmentation.
Critique of Grand Theories
- They argue against the ‘grand narratives’ of other sociological perspectives, suggesting that these theories are no longer relevant to the complexity of the postmodern world.
- They believe these grand theories oversimplify the pluralistic, diverse societies we now live in and fail to address the rapid changes caused by technology and globalisation.
New Technologies and Globalisation
- Postmodernists contend that modern education has been significantly impacted by technological advancements and globalisation.
- They contend that the internet and digital technologies have brought an era of information abundance which is shifting the nature of knowledge and learning.
Uncertain Knowledge and Individual Subjects
- They argue that subject knowledge in education has become unstable and uncertain. The validity of knowledge is no longer absolute and uncontested, allowing for multiple viewpoints and interpretations.
- This idea of the ‘decentred subject’ posits that students are no longer moulded by the shared norms and values transmitted by education, but by a variety of differing influences.
Role of Teachers
- The role of teachers has changed from traditional disseminators of knowledge to facilitators, guiding students through a maze of global information networks.
- Postmodernists argue that today, anyone can produce and access knowledge online, leading to a democratisation of information.
Critiques of Postmodernist Perspective
- Critics argue that the postmodernist viewpoint is too relativistic and fragmented. Oversimplifying the influence of technology, they underestimate the persisting impact of traditional structures and institutions.
- They’re also critiqued for failing to address the structural inequalities in education. For instance, despite digital advancements, there’s still a notable digital divide between those with and without access to technology.
- Critics also challenge the idea that knowledge has become unstable, arguing that systemic knowledge and expertise still yield power in education and the workforce.