Applying Barthes to charity advertising

Applying Barthes to charity advertising

Understanding Barthes and Charity Advertising

  • Roland Barthes is a leading figure in semiotics, the study of signs and symbols.
  • Barthes’ theory can be used to understand how symbolism is used in charity advertising.
  • In general, charity adverts use visual and verbal signs to create emotive appeals to compel the audience to donate or take action.
  • Barthes’ approach typically involves two orders of signification:
    • The denotative (literal meaning of the sign).
    • The connotative (symbolic or cultural meanings that the sign invokes).

Applying Barthes: Denotation in Charity Adverts

  • Consider a charity advert featuring an image of a sad, impoverished child.
  • The denotation of this image, according to Barthes, is a child in need.
  • This literal, factual representation taps into an immediate human response of empathy or concern.

Applying Barthes: Connotation in Charity Adverts

  • The connotation of the image is where the power of charity advertising becomes apparent.
  • The impoverished child symbolises hopelessness, suffering and the need for immediate action.
  • The image also suggests a dichotomy between the audience’s world (abundance and wealth) and the child’s world (poverty and suffering).
  • Such connotations are designed to instigate an emotional response, prompting the viewer to donate or act.

Use of Text in Charity Adverts

  • Text in charity adverts typically complements the visual image, driving home the desired emotional response and the call to action.
  • For example, a phrase like “Every day, this child goes hungry” makes explicit the denoted ‘child in need’.
  • This text is also loaded with connotations of unfair suffering, injustice, and urgency.
  • The overall effect compels the audience to reflect on their own circumstances, feel moved by the injustice, and possibly make a donation or take action to help alleviate the situation.

Myth in Charity Adverts

  • Beyond the denotative and connotative levels, Barthes describes another level of signification: myth.
  • In charity advertising, myth can refer to a larger social or cultural belief or ideal that the advert taps into.
  • For example, an advert might suggest the myth of ‘benevolent Western saviour’ - the idea that wealthier people/place/entities have a moral duty to help poorer ones.
  • By being aware of these underlying myths, we can better understand the strategic symbolic choices advertisers make, and how these choices influence audiences.

Conclusion

  • Barthes’ semiotics is a key tool for understanding and analysing how charity advertising functions.
  • Analysing an advertisement’s denotations, connotations and underlying myths helps uncover the intended strategies and effects of a charity advert.