The Guardian: Live Music review, 2018

The Guardian: Live Music review, 2018

  • Context: This review was written in 2018 for The Guardian, a respected UK-based newspaper known for providing comprehensive coverage of news, politics, and culture.

  • Author’s purpose: The author aims to provide an insightful critique of the performance they attended, including details on the artist’s performance, the crowd’s reaction, and the overall atmosphere.

  • Structure: This review takes a linear structure, beginning with background information about the artist or event, providing a chronological account of the event, and then wrapping up with final thoughts and a rating.

  • Tone and Style: The tone of this review might skew informal or conversational, reflecting The Guardian’s reader demographic of educated but not overly academic individuals. The language can be descriptive and emotive, aiming to convey not just the physical happenings of the event, but the feeling and atmosphere.

  • Language : Includes complex vocabulary and idiomatic expressions. The review might incorporate relevant musical jargon and may use metaphorical language to encapsively describe the musical performance.

  • Critical Analysis: How does the author convey their opinions and judgements? What techniques are used to persuade the reader about the quality of the performance?

Sophie Arthur: ‘About’ blog page –Soph Talks Science, 2018

  • Context: Sophie’s ‘About’ page is an introduction to her and her blog, Soph Talks Science, which is dedicated to making science more accessible.

  • Author’s Purpose: The main goal of this page is to introduce Sophie to her readers, demonstrate her credibility as a science communicator, and set the tone for her blog.

  • Structure: The ‘About’ page begins with a personal introduction, then goes into Sophie’s professional background and academic credentials. It ends with what readers can expect from the blog.

  • Tone and Style: The tone is likely friendly and approachable to make science topics more appealing and less intimidating to readers.

  • Language: Technical scientific jargon is likely explained or simplified to make the content more accessible. The author may use first-person narrative style to give a personal touch.

  • Critical Analysis: Identify the persuasive techniques used by the author to engage readers and to inspire interest and curiosity in science topics.