Caligula: relationships between performers and audience

The audience acts as passive observers of the tyranny of Caligula, creating an uncomfortable atmosphere similar to that experienced by the subjects of his rule.
They are frequently tested and challenged by the moral and philosophical dilemmas presented, provoking introspection and thought.
Experiencing the reign of Caligula through the perspectives of his victims fosters empathy and a deeper understanding of the fears and oppression suffered under his rule.

Performers maintain a ‘fourth wall’ which limits direct interaction with the audience, enhancing the sense of voyeuristic discomfort.
Character monologues and soliloquies often feel as though they are addressed directly to the audience, creating a sense of intimacy and insight into the character’s mind.
The use of physical and symbolic actions by the performers can communicate moods, intentions, or character states which engage and draw the audience into the play.

The brutality and chaos portrayed in Caligula can invoke feelings of shock, repulsion, or horror in the audience, in line with the play’s nihilistic themes.
Reactions may vary according to personal interpretations, with some audience members feeling sympathy towards Caligula due to his clear madness, and others feeling revulsion at his cruel and erratic behaviour.
The philosophical and existentialist themes encourage the audience to reflect on questions around meaning, freedom, and the human condition.

Audience reactions may influence the intensity and delivery of a performer’s lines or actions. A shocked gasp, for example, may prompt heightened dramatic tension.
Moments of silence or anticipation from the audience can build dramatic tension during the performance and impact the rhythm and pacing of the play.
Varied interpretations by different audiences can encourage a wide range of performances and production choices over time, ensuring a freshness and diversity in interpretations of Caligula.