The Long and the Short and the Tall: character motivation and interaction

Character Motivation

Bamforth’s rebellion - His anti-authoritarian streak and defiance towards his superiors is a form of protest against their perceived incompetence and arrogance. He appears to be motivated by a sense of injustice against the disciplined, hierarchical military system.
MacLeish’s fear and empathy - MacLeish often reacts out of fear, triggered by the war and his longing for home and family. He empathises with the Japanese prisoner due to shared fatherhood.
Mitchem’s sense of duty - As the patrol’s Sergeant, Mitchem’s actions are driven by his responsibility towards his men and the mission. His insistence on rules and orders is a coping mechanism in the chaotic environment of war.
Whitaker’s innocence and inexperience - His naivety and inexperienced behaviour is driven by his recent inclusion in the war. He represents the youth thrown into warfare, unprepared and fearful.

Character Interaction

Hierarchy and conflict - Hierarchical relationships in the soldier group create a power dynamic that affects their interaction. The power struggle between Bamforth and Mitchem serves as a constant source of tension.
Peer relationships - Relationships not defined by rank, for example, the camaraderie between Smith and Evans, show a different dynamic of interaction, based on mutual respect and understanding.
Treatment of the prisoner - How the soldiers interact with the Japanese prisoner provides insight into their prejudices, humanity, and their understanding of the enemy. This interaction goes from hostility, to tolerance, and in Bamforth’s case, even friendship.
Group dynamics - When faced with threat and stress, the group’s interactions fluctuate between unity and discord. They reflect the churning emotions within each character and highlight the key themes of fear, survival and moral conflict.

Character Development

Bamforth’s transformation - Originally the volatile and disruptive element, Bamforth becomes the voice of compassion and rebellion against war-time dehumanisation.
Mitchem’s consistency - Despite the crumbling discipline and rising tension, Mitchem remains steadfast, representing duty and order amidst chaos.
MacLeish’s disillusionment - His initial idealism is eroded as he grapples with the harsh realities of war, culminating in a tragic end.
Whitaker’s loss of innocence - His character arc mirrors the journey of many young soldiers; from naivety and fear, to a forced maturity brought on by violent conflict.