The Love of the Nightingale: social context

The Love of the Nightingale: Social Context

Ancient Greece

• The original myth of Philomele and Procne originates in Ancient Greece, a society marked by its patriarchal structure.
• Women were largely denied public involvement and restricted to the household; this restriction is echoed in the characters’ lack of freedom and agency.
• Concepts of honour and shame were vital in this society, which can be seen when Philomele is shamed and silenced after her assault.

Modern Western Society

• While the play is based on Ancient Greek myth, it can also be seen to critique aspects of modern Western society, including its treatment of women.
• The play tackles issues of censorship and the silencing of women’s voices in public discourse, echoing modern feminist concerns.
• Issues surrounding rape culture may resonate with audiences, particularly the way Tereus escapes retribution for his actions, which mirrors how some assault cases are handled today.

Performative Nature of Society

• Wertenbaker explores the performative nature of society, where individuals may feel compelled to pretend or perform societal roles, which becomes evident in the behaviour of Tereus and Procne.
• This critique is enhanced through the use of the Chorus, who comment on the action of the play and reflect societal norms and expectations back to the audience.

Feminism and Patriarchy

• The play can be interpreted as a feminist critique of patriarchy. Tereus, as a symbol of patriarchal power, controls, silences, and violates women.
• The story encourages audiences to question societal norms that devalue women and to support women’s empowerment.

In conclusion, “The Love of the Nightingale” is rich with social context from various periods, with a critical view of patriarchal societies and strong feminist themes. By considering this context, a more nuanced understanding of the play and the characters’ actions can be built.